We conclude that the Leiden algorithm is strongly preferable to the Louvain algorithm. Contrary to what might be expected, iterating the Louvain algorithm aggravates the problem of badly connected communities, as we will also see in our experimental analysis. In that case, nodes 16 are all locally optimally assigned, despite the fact that their community has become disconnected. ACM Trans. Unsupervised clustering of cells is a common step in many single-cell expression workflows. In particular, in an attempt to find better partitions, multiple consecutive iterations of the algorithm can be performed, using the partition identified in one iteration as starting point for the next iteration. For example an SNN can be generated: For Seurat version 3 objects, the Leiden algorithm has been implemented in the Seurat version 3 package with Seurat::FindClusters and algorithm = "leiden"). At each iteration all clusters are guaranteed to be connected and well-separated. The Louvain algorithm guarantees that modularity cannot be increased by merging communities (it finds a locally optimal solution). 69 (2 Pt 2): 026113. http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113. It only implies that individual nodes are well connected to their community. & Girvan, M. Finding and evaluating community structure in networks. In this way, Leiden implements the local moving phase more efficiently than Louvain. This step will involve reducing the dimensionality of our data into two dimensions using uniform manifold approximation (UMAP), allowing us to visualize our cell populations as they are binned into discrete populations using Leiden clustering. Lancichinetti, A., Fortunato, S. & Radicchi, F. Benchmark graphs for testing community detection algorithms. The Leiden algorithm is considerably more complex than the Louvain algorithm. However, after all nodes have been visited once, Leiden visits only nodes whose neighbourhood has changed, whereas Louvain keeps visiting all nodes in the network. For lower values of , the correct partition is easy to find and Leiden is only about twice as fast as Louvain. Technol. Analyses based on benchmark networks have only a limited value because these networks are not representative of empirical real-world networks. As shown in Fig. In addition, to analyse whether a community is badly connected, we ran the Leiden algorithm on the subnetwork consisting of all nodes belonging to the community. Leiden consists of the following steps: Local moving of nodes Partition refinement Network aggregation The refinement step allows badly connected communities to be split before creating the aggregate network. In other words, communities are guaranteed to be well separated. S3. We first applied the Scanpy pipeline, including its clustering method (Leiden clustering), on the PBMC dataset. To install the development version: The current release on CRAN can be installed with: First set up a compatible adjacency matrix: An adjacency matrix is any binary matrix representing links between nodes (column and row names). They identified an inefficiency in the Louvain algorithm: computes modularity gain for all neighbouring nodes per loop in local moving phase, even though many of these nodes will not have moved. As far as I can tell, Leiden seems to essentially be smart local moving with the additional improvements of random moving and Louvain pruning added. Hence, the community remains disconnected, unless it is merged with another community that happens to act as a bridge. While current approaches are successful in reducing the number of sequence alignments performed, the generated clusters are . Phys. We also suggested that the Leiden algorithm is faster than the Louvain algorithm, because of the fast local move approach. When a disconnected community has become a node in an aggregate network, there are no more possibilities to split up the community. A Comparative Analysis of Community Detection Algorithms on Artificial Networks. This contrasts to benchmark networks, for which Leiden often converges after a few iterations. Internet Explorer). This may have serious consequences for analyses based on the resulting partitions. Note that the object for Seurat version 3 has changed. Furthermore, by relying on a fast local move approach, the Leiden algorithm runs faster than the Louvain algorithm. The steps for agglomerative clustering are as follows: The quality of such an asymptotically stable partition provides an upper bound on the quality of an optimal partition. Because the percentage of disconnected communities in the first iteration of the Louvain algorithm usually seems to be relatively low, the problem may have escaped attention from users of the algorithm. Technol. We here introduce the Leiden algorithm, which guarantees that communities are well connected. Empirical networks show a much richer and more complex structure. Publishers note: Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations. Soft Matter Phys. This commit does not belong to any branch on this repository, and may belong to a fork outside of the repository. Nevertheless, when CPM is used as the quality function, the Louvain algorithm may still find arbitrarily badly connected communities. Article This will compute the Leiden clusters and add them to the Seurat Object Class. It identifies the clusters by calculating the densities of the cells. 7, whereas Louvain becomes much slower for more difficult partitions, Leiden is much less affected by the difficulty of the partition. Community detection is often used to understand the structure of large and complex networks. Large network community detection by fast label propagation, Representative community divisions of networks, Gausss law for networks directly reveals community boundaries, A Regularized Stochastic Block Model for the robust community detection in complex networks, Community Detection in Complex Networks via Clique Conductance, A generalised significance test for individual communities in networks, Community Detection on Networkswith Ricci Flow, https://github.com/CWTSLeiden/networkanalysis, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physrep.2009.11.002, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.016110, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.70.066111, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.027104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.74.036104, https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.80.056117, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.84.016114, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-40829-0, https://doi.org/10.17706/IJCEE.2016.8.3.207-218, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.032801, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.036106, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.78.046110, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046106, http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/, A robust and accurate single-cell data trajectory inference method using ensemble pseudotime, Batch alignment of single-cell transcriptomics data using deep metric learning, ViralCC retrieves complete viral genomes and virus-host pairs from metagenomic Hi-C data, Community detection in brain connectomes with hybrid quantum computing. Nodes 06 are in the same community. Article Communities may even be disconnected. Rep. 6, 30750, https://doi.org/10.1038/srep30750 (2016). DBSCAN Clustering Explained Detailed theorotical explanation and scikit-learn implementation Clustering is a way to group a set of data points in a way that similar data points are grouped together. In the case of the Louvain algorithm, after a stable iteration, all subsequent iterations will be stable as well. In this case we know the answer is exactly 10. We used modularity with a resolution parameter of =1 for the experiments. This method tries to maximise the difference between the actual number of edges in a community and the expected number of such edges. We prove that the new algorithm is guaranteed to produce partitions in which all communities are internally connected. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the articles Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. Complex brain networks: graph theoretical analysis of structural and functional systems. In particular, we show that Louvain may identify communities that are internally disconnected. A Simple Acceleration Method for the Louvain Algorithm. Int. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate. The degree of randomness in the selection of a community is determined by a parameter >0. Speed of the first iteration of the Louvain and the Leiden algorithm for benchmark networks with increasingly difficult partitions (n=107). E 76, 036106, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.76.036106 (2007). Indeed, the percentage of disconnected communities becomes more comparable to the percentage of badly connected communities in later iterations. Subpartition -density is not guaranteed by the Louvain algorithm. Again, if communities are badly connected, this may lead to incorrect inferences of topics, which will affect bibliometric analyses relying on the inferred topics. The algorithm continues to move nodes in the rest of the network. running Leiden clustering finished: found 16 clusters and added 'leiden_1.0', the cluster labels (adata.obs, categorical) (0:00:00) running Leiden clustering finished: found 12 clusters and added 'leiden_0.6', the cluster labels (adata.obs, categorical) (0:00:00) running Leiden clustering finished: found 9 clusters and added 'leiden_0.4', the Guimer, R. & Nunes Amaral, L. A. Functional cartography of complex metabolic networks. The fast local move procedure can be summarised as follows. However, this is not necessarily the case, as the other nodes may still be sufficiently strongly connected to their community, despite the fact that the community has become disconnected. E 72, 027104, https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.72.027104 (2005). Nonlin. The algorithm optimises a quality function such as modularity or CPM in two elementary phases: (1) local moving of nodes; and (2) aggregation of the network. Google Scholar. Runtime versus quality for empirical networks. Phys. Besides the relative flexibility of the implementation, it also scales well, and can be run on graphs of millions of nodes (as long as they can fit in memory). Rather than evaluating the modularity gain for moving a node to each neighboring communities, we choose a neighboring node at random and evaluate whether there is a gain in modularity if we were to move the node to that neighbors community. V.A.T. Nat. In the worst case, almost a quarter of the communities are badly connected. As shown in Fig. Rather than progress straight to the aggregation stage (as we would for the original Louvain), we next consider each community as a new sub-network and re-apply the local moving step within each community. That is, no subset can be moved to a different community. http://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1742-5468/2008/10/P10008/meta, http://dx.doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0605965104, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.69.026113, https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4ea9/74f0fadb57a0b1ec35cbc5b3eb28e9b966d8.pdf, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.81.046114, http://dx.doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevE.92.032801, https://doi.org/10.1140/epjb/e2013-40829-0, Assign each node to a different community. Finding communities in large networks is far from trivial: algorithms need to be fast, but they also need to provide high-quality results. In short, the problem of badly connected communities has important practical consequences. In fact, by implementing the refinement phase in the right way, several attractive guarantees can be given for partitions produced by the Leiden algorithm. An iteration of the Leiden algorithm in which the partition does not change is called a stable iteration. Speed and quality for the first 10 iterations of the Louvain and the Leiden algorithm for six empirical networks. Slider with three articles shown per slide. In this new situation, nodes 2, 3, 5 and 6 have only internal connections. Edges were created in such a way that an edge fell between two communities with a probability and within a community with a probability 1. The above results shows that the problem of disconnected and badly connected communities is quite pervasive in practice. Randomness in the selection of a community allows the partition space to be explored more broadly. Blondel, V D, J L Guillaume, and R Lambiotte. Four popular community detection algorithms are explained . For larger networks and higher values of , Louvain is much slower than Leiden. If material is not included in the articles Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. For example, for the Web of Science network, the first iteration takes about 110120 seconds, while subsequent iterations require about 40 seconds. J. The corresponding results are presented in the Supplementary Fig. 2010. (We implemented both algorithms in Java, available from https://github.com/CWTSLeiden/networkanalysis and deposited at Zenodo23. The constant Potts model (CPM), so called due to the use of a constant value in the Potts model, is an alternative objective function for community detection. The Leiden algorithm has been specifically designed to address the problem of badly connected communities. The resolution limit describes a limitation where there is a minimum community size able to be resolved by optimizing modularity (or other related functions). With one exception (=0.2 and n=107), all results in Fig. ADS This will compute the Leiden clusters and add them to the Seurat Object Class. Once aggregation is complete we restart the local moving phase, and continue to iterate until everything converges down to one node. The algorithm may yield arbitrarily badly connected communities, over and above the well-known issue of the resolution limit14. Correspondence to In the first step of the next iteration, Louvain will again move individual nodes in the network.